Fons Trompenaars on Cultural Leadership and Innovation


I’ve been a fan of Fons Trompenaars ever since I read the book “Riding the Waves of Culture” about a decade ago. See the Books page on this blog for a link. Enjoy these two short videos by Dr. Trompernaars.

Multicultural leadership is about reconciling the differences in culture.

Innovation also leverages cultural diversity.

Adapt or Die – US Military develops Agile Leaders


I read a very interesting paper on why the traditional Command and Control, plan up-front approach steeped in military history must change.

“Operating within an uncertain, unpredictable environment, the Army must be prepared to sustain operations during a period of persistent conflict—a blurring of familiar distinctions between war and peace.” This is a protracted war against adversaries employing irregular, unconventional, and asymmetrical means. The implications of this new context are clear: “Adapt or Die.”

The landscape of warfare has changed. More uncertainty, hidden enemies, and unpredictability. Training leaders to respond in this context requires a different approach.

The Army’s Training and Leader Development Panel (ATLDP) Officer Study concluded that, because of the ambiguous nature of the future operating environment, leaders should focus on developing the “enduring competencies,” or what they call metacompetencies, of self-awareness and adaptability. They recognized that the two were symbiotic; one without the other is useless. These metacompetencies are the essential building blocks of learning. Agility embodies this symbiotic relationship between self-awareness and adaptability. In this paper, agility is a metaphor for self-awareness and adaptability in action, the essence of learning.

Adapting fast requires changes in doctrine and the evolution of rapid organizational learning.

The process of rapid, effective organizational learning is the essence of organizational agility.

Senior leaders have the authority and resources to drive this change into their organizations, be they military organizations, or otherwise. The organization’s culture must be tuned to allow Agility to take hold. Differences between British and American military culture is telling.

Culture is unique; it is the organization’s personality based on its own set of experiences. Nagl’s study, as well as others that he cites, show the differences between the American and British military cultures and the impact on their ability to innovate during conflict. His conclusion is that differences in organizational culture allowed the British military to adapt and learn during its irregular warfare experience of counterinsurgency in Malaya, while the U.S. Army’s culture prevented it from learning during its similar experiences in Vietnam. Culture, an organization’s conventional wisdom about its essence, is a powerful lens that organizations use in interpreting their experiences and determining how or what to learn from these experiences.

The change in mindset required is the adoption of the “culture of innovation”

The training approach recommended in this paper is a move away from the traditional master-apprentice approach to that of co-learner and facilitator. I’ll close with this quote from the paper which says it all.

Rather than operating in a paradigm that perceives certain determinable linear cause-and-effect relationships, students will operate in a context that sees holistic, open, dynamic, emergent, complexly organized, rationalistic relationships that are too complex to be absolutely known. Applying knowledge and skill sets in this complex and ambiguous environment, dealing with the unexpected, operating with incomplete information, and making calculated decisions of risk all increase individual agility.

You can find the paper here.

Yves Charreire – Thoughts and Facts on Agile


This is a guest post by Yves Charreire. Some insightful, practical thoughts on transitioning from Waterfall to Agile in large-scale complex product development. Thanks so very much, Yves, for this post!

Thoughts and Facts in Agile

I am just a frenchy 🙂 , who gets a great chance to share professional culture with North American and Chinese colleagues. I am not at all an Agile Guru, but I would like to share some thoughts and facts about Agile on Raj’s forum.

When Dave Packard and Bill Hewlett invented their very first audio oscillator, or when Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak created their first computer were they Agile or waterfall? …. Probably none of the two.

They just succeeded in giving valuable real working innovation: In the Steve’s story, the very first computer deal was very clear: In the planning phase, Paul Terrell, their first customer, said he would order 50 of the machines and pay US $500 each on delivery, while HP’s founder was dealing with a 50 dollar stable oscillator breaking state of the art that needed a 200 dollars bill for an unstable one. Innovation was made possible also by a cross functional very small team focusing on one single objective with an obvious sense of survival (i.e for the company) including accepting risk to fail.

Continue reading

Perfection and Pragmatism


This is a long post, so here is the digest version first.

  • Develop a vision of perfection for your Agile business that includes the product AND the people that create it.
  • Think about what it feels like to work in this perfect Nirvana – engage your right brain.
  • Start moving toward that vision now as fast as you can without losing control – be pragmatic.
  • Be prepared to suffer some mental pain along the way – so eat cookies and drink milk.

That’s it. The rest of the post is some ranting to prime some thinking.

Continue reading